The arbitration agreement California employers currently deal with should always meet the Fair Employment and Housing Act criteria. This increases the probability that current and future arbitration agreements will be enforced.
Fair Employment and Housing Act criteria encompass many levels of agreement, including:
The Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) allows California workers and private citizens to pursue legal steps that the state would normally take. This means an employee with a grievance involving a violation of California employment law can file a civil claim against their employer.
An example of employees taking advantage of PAGA involves Uber drivers who were required to sign an arbitration agreement prior to their being hired. In this case, the drivers filed suit and are seeking reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs, such as fuel, due to their objection to company policy that states drivers must tell customers that tips are part of the total price of a ride.
There are two requirements for PAGA to be put into play. The California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) must be notified by the complainant, and the LWDA must not already be pursuing the case or in the process of issuing citations.
When both requirements are met, the employee has the authority to file suit. If the employee wins the suit, resulting in a monetary payout, the civil penalties are split 75/25 with the LWDA taking the largest portion and the employee the remainder.
Employer violations fall into one-of-three classes:
To be enforceable, it must be determined if the arbitration agreement addresses waivable private rights or unwaivable public rights. Public rights include things such as discrimination, wages, and overtime pay, whereas private rights cover areas such as product ownership and confidentiality agreements.
Before a court can rule that an arbitration provision does not have to be enforced due to the provision being unconscionable, there must first be a substantive and procedural analysis.
Procedural unconscionability addresses how the contract was initially negotiated and the circumstances of the parties involved. The two relevant factors that are considered are surprise and oppression. In other words, procedural unconscionability is looked at as a stronger party presenting a weaker party with a contract that is drafted as take it or leave it.
Employment contracts almost always include a "take it or leave it" situation. This means there's a high degree of certainty that the arbitration provision will be deemed procedurally unconscionable. Regarding substantive unconscionability, the focus is on the terms of the arbitration agreement and if the terms are unbalanced and one-sided.
Four elements must be present in an arbitration provision covering unwaivable public rights for the provision to be enforceable. The California Supreme Court put these elements in place.
The arbitration provision won't have any limitations in regard to statutes available to an employee.
The arbitration provision shouldn't include any restrictions that inhibit the parties involved from a full range of discovery, such as obtaining documents or taking depositions from the opposing party.
A written decision by the arbitrator must include the findings and conclusions, which formed the basis for the arbitration award.
For an arbitration provision to be enforceable, the cost of arbitration must be paid by the employer. No part of the cost will be the responsibility of the employee.
If you need help with an arbitration agreement in California, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.